Quantcast
Channel: Morgan Stanley
Viewing all 1395 articles
Browse latest View live

Red-hot stocks are getting a boost from an unexpected source

$
0
0

Bonfire

Stocks are back near record highs, and they have a surprisingly weak US dollar to thank.

It wasn't supposed to be like this.

After President Donald Trump's shocking victory in November sent the dollar surging into year-end, it was widely expected that it would continue to climb.

Then, amid doubts that the pro-growth agenda floated by Trump would get done in timely fashion, the dollar's fortune reversed, shocking just about everyone. And it's done so in spectacular fashion, falling roughly 8% since the start of 2017.

That's resulted in an unexpected boost for US corporate earnings that are already the best in five years. A weaker dollar makes exports more profitable, which helps companies doing business overseas — most notably the multinational conglomerates with big weightings in stock indexes. And good, old-fashioned profitability has historically been the biggest driver of equity bull markets.

"The US dollar has been exceptionally and unexpectedly weak this year," a group of Morgan Stanley strategists led by Michael J. Wilson wrote in a client note. "A weaker US dollar is positively related to S&P 500 sales growth and earnings revisions."

Even if the US dollar climbs 5% from current levels through year-end, S&P 500 revenue growth will still rise, according to data compiled by Morgan Stanley. And that's the most bearish scenario laid out by the firm in this chart:

Screen Shot 2017 07 24 at 2.00.08 PM

Now that we know the benefits of a weak dollar, let's take a deeper look at the causes. Trump's lack of policy follow-through has certainly hindered the currency, but it's far from the only driver.

Weaker-than-expected US economic data has also contributed to dollar depreciation, especially when compared to Europe and parts of emerging markets, says Morgan Stanley.

The firm also attributes a surprisingly hawkish European Central Bank, which many on Wall Street think will start tapering its asset purchase program later this year. Not to mention the Federal Reserve, which is expected to begin unwinding its massive balance sheet before the end of the year.

Screen Shot 2017 07 24 at 1.58.58 PM

 

SEE ALSO: A 'big fall' in markets is coming as traders put record cash to work

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An economist explains the key issues that Trump needs to address to boost the economy


Morgan Stanley is throwing its support behind five minority-led tech firms (MS)

$
0
0

James Gorman

Morgan Stanley has launched a new Multicultural Innovation Lab to help propel minority-led tech startups. 

The first cohort of companies the lab is sponsoring include five tech firms, spanning industries from commerce to finance. 

The bank will sponsor two cohorts a year. 

The selected companies are working out of Morgan Stanley's global headquarters in New York during the four-month program. As such, they will be able to tap into the bank's networks to identify potential customers and investors, according to a spokesperson for Morgan Stanley. 

The companies also have access to insights from Newark Venture Partners, a New Jersey-based venture capital firm, and Techstars, a global entrepreneurial network. 

William Crowder, formerly head of Comcast Ventures, is the Entrepreneur-In-Residence.

The point of the incubator is to help entrepreneurs of minority backgrounds, who are often ignored by venture capital firms, scale and grow.

“With less than 3% of venture capital dollars going to multicultural entrepreneurs, we will use Morgan Stanley’s global reach to provide the capital, content, and connections needed to help accelerate the growth of these exciting companies and help bridge that funding gap,” said Alice Vilma, executive director of Morgan Stanley.

The five firms selected are as follows: 

  • AptDeco - AptDeco is a peer-to-peer marketplace that connects buyers and sellers of preowned furniture.
  • GitLinks - GitLinks helps clients monitor security and legal compliance using artificial intelligence.
  • Kairos - Kairos helps businesses integrate facial recognition capabilities into their infrastructures.
  • Landit - Landit is a social networking site that provides a platform for women to achieve success by connecting them with personalized career advancement opportunities.
  • Trigger Finance - Trigger Finance sifts through relevant world and financial news events for do-it-yourself investors and identifies actions they can make to best position their portfolio. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: TOP STRATEGIST: Bitcoin will soar to over $20,000 by cannibalizing gold

MORGAN STANLEY: GoPro ‘must find new use cases’

$
0
0

CEO of GoPro Nick Woodman

GoPro has struggled for years to branch out from its core action camera segment, but analysts at Morgan Stanley see promise in the company’s new editing software.

“The recently introduced QuikStories marks steady progress in the right direction,” according to a research note by a team of Morgan Stanley analysts led by Yuuji Anderson. “But we think it is still too early for GoPro's software ecosystem to meaningfully draw incremental adopters to the action camera category.”

The company has admitted to missing the smartphone revolution as far back as 2014 and has been playing catch up ever since. Luckily, Thursday’s earnings were GoPro’s ninth beat in 13 quarters, with a reported loss of $0.09 per share compared to estimates of a $0.25 loss.

“We believe that GoPro's biggest opportunity may be to serve as an untethered lens for the smartphone," CEO Nicholas Woodman said on the company’s earnings call Thursday. "Central to this vision is the belief that GoPro is no longer just a camera, a standalone device. Now, with our seamless app experience, a GoPro is a powerful extension of the smartphone itself."

QuikStories was launched late last month and lets users easily transfer video from their GoPro camera onto a smartphone for easier editing and posting.

The app’s release coupled with another successful quarter led Morgan Stanley to up its price target to $8.50, which GoPro quickly blew past as soon as markets opened Friday, reaching a $10.38 peak mid-morning.

But the bank warns that GoPro still has work to do. “Innovation has slowed and smartphones are good enough for many use cases, which limits incremental adoption of action cameras. GoPro must find new use cases like drones and VR,” the analysts wrote.

“Continued progress in differentiating video editing and sharing capabilities progress is key to consistent product cycles in the long term.”

Seth Archer contributed to this report.

Check out GoPro's stock price here.

Screen Shot 2017 08 04 at 12.44.29 PM

SEE ALSO: GoPro is taking off after earnings

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Stocks have shrugged off Trump headlines to hit new highs this week

Morgan Stanley bumps up its Tesla price target — and moves its best-case scenario higher (TSLA)

$
0
0

model 3 event

Morgan Stanley's Adam Jonas raised his price target for Tesla shares, to $317 from $305.

The carmaker's shares are already well above that, at $366 and up 70% year-to-date. Jonas, though, also has a "bull case" price target which he raised to $526 from $511.

The bull case is Jonas' term for Tesla out-executing by a wide margin and effectively becoming a dominant provider of cars, energy storage, and transportation services.

Shares were up another 2% on Monday.

"Both moves are fully explained by an increase in our valuation of the core auto business and we make no changes at this time to our valuations of Tesla Mobility, Tesla Energy, or Solar City," Jonas wrote in his research note.

This continues a theme for the analyst. He has been focused on Tesla ability to build and deliver vehicles and hasn't become overly distracted by the company's additional business.

However, Jonas did highlight advantages provided by Tesla Supercharger network.

"Although other auto companies have launched and will continue to launch electric vehicles, we are not aware of any other auto company that is building out the necessary after-sales infrastructure to support a significant volume of electric vehicles in the car parc," he wrote. "EV infrastructure will be crucial to enable an ownership and operating experience commensurate with the product."

Viewed from another perspective, maintaining a far-flung refueling system is a cost that potentially competing automakers haven't had to absorb. It also remains to be seen whether Tesla's Supercharger network will be able to handle an influx of hundreds of thousands of new vehicles over the next few years, as the Model 3 becomes more prevalent on roadways.

Jonas also reiterated his belief that Tesla's real competition will come not from established automakers, but from technology companies. This is a controversial view.

While Waymo has racked out millions of self-driving miles, it has yet to commercialize its tech. Uber's nearly $70-billion pre-IPO valuation is in doubt as the companies endures an increasingly nasty management crisis. And Apple has yet to provide much clarity on its plans for what remains of its "Project Titan" transportation initiative.

TSLA Chart

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Fidelity portfolio manager: Test driving a Tesla was an 'iPhone moment'

MORGAN STANLEY: Don't let these 6 interview questions trip you up

$
0
0

Carla Harris Morgan StanleyWhat are interviewers really looking for when they ask questions like "what are your strengths and weaknesses?" Carla Harris, vice chairwoman at Morgan Stanley, has revealed the subtext.

If you think the most common interview questions are often the most difficult to answer, then you’re not alone. More people trip up on things like “tell us about yourself” and “what is your biggest weakness?” than questions about their skills.

That’s because the most common interview questions all have a subtext, explains Carla Harris, vice chairwoman at Morgan Stanley. “What an interviewer is really trying to find out by asking common questions,  is what kind of personality you have;  are you a leader or a good pair of hands and will you fit in? They already know you have the qualifications because they’ve seen your resume.”

Harris has coached hundreds of people on their careers during her 30 years at Morgan Stanley and is the author of Expect to Win and Strategize To Win. We asked her to demystify some of the most common interview questions — here’s what she said:

SEE ALSO: Millennials are driving a $9 trillion change in investing

Tell Me About Yourself

“This is the first question you’re likely to get in an interview and it’s the one that people most often struggle with,” says Harris. “This isn’t an invitation to recite your life story or go through your resume. Instead, the interviewer is trying to find out if you’re a good fit for the job, so talk about the experience that’s relevant to the job. This question is an opportunity to connect the dots on your resume. It’s important that you understand the key success factors for the job that you are interviewing for so that you tell your story using those descriptors.”

Tip:“Try to hit the qualities in the job description. The interviewer wants information that is pertinent to the job you’re interviewing for.”



Describe yourself in three words

“This is a question designed to see if you’ve paid attention to the job specs and if you have qualities that best match the role,” Harris explains. “For example, if you’re going for an internship on Wall Street, you might say “analytical, detail-oriented, quantitative.” If it’s a sales job, then maybe “commercial, competitive, connector” – that’s assuming of course that these words do really describe you!”

Tip:“Make sure you have examples to back up each word, in case the interviewer asks you to elaborate. And read up on the company’s core values.”



What’s your biggest weakness?

“This question trips a lot of people up – but it comes up frequently in interviews, so it’s one well worth prepping for,” notes Harris. “Pick a weakness that’s not a key competency for the job and most importantly show self-awareness by explaining what you’ve done or are doing or continue to deal with to overcome this weakness.”  

Tip:“Don’t say you’re a perfectionist. It’s so clichéd and won’t come across as genuine. You may want to offer something that would be helpful in your new role, like, I am working on public speaking skills.”



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Victoria's Secret is abandoning the hottest lingerie trend — and it's a brilliant maneuver

$
0
0

victoria's secret

Young women are increasingly choosing bralettes over bras — and Victoria's Secret is bucking the trend. 

"Bralettes trend up and down and we’ll have them," CEO Jan Singer told analysts on a conference call, as reported by the New York Post. "But we make constructed bras best and anyone can make bralettes. We get paid for construction."

Bralettes are typically less padded than the push-up bras that put Victoria's Secret on the map.

They're also cheaper, which could be eroding margins — the company typically charges $25 for a bralette and $50 for a bra.

Selling more of its classic products would help differentiate Victoria's Secret from competitors like Aerie. 

Victoria's Secret sales are down despite an overall surge in the lingerie market. Shares of its parent company, Limited Brands, have been falling on the news. 

Analysts at Morgan Stanley think recent panic about the state of Victoria's Secret's business is overblown. 

"We acknowledge the Victoria's Secret turnaround is taking longer than we or the market anticipated, but the stock is trading like a business in structural decline, which we disagree with for several key reasons," the analysts write in a note to clients. 

The analysts write that Victoria's Secret still controls 27% of the lingerie market and is largely protected from e-commerce competitors because customers prefer to be fitted in person. 

Morgan Stanley does suggest one way Victoria's Secret could improve: by bringing back swimwear online. 

The online swimwear business was worth a reported $500 million when Victoria's Secret shut it down last year. 

SEE ALSO: Millennials reveal their top 100 favorite brands

Follow Us: On Facebook

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What this symbol on the back of your hair gel actually means

Snap's lead IPO underwriter lowers its price target — again (SNAP)

$
0
0

SNAP IPO 11

Snap's lead initial public offering underwriter, Morgan Stanley, has gotten even more bearish on the stock.

In a note to clients on Wednesday, the bank maintained its neutral rating of the company, but lowered its price target from $16 to $14.

"We believe Snap's core ad product is still lacking the performance (low click-through rates), measurability, and advertising return on investment to inflect ad dollar growth," Brian Nowak, an analyst at Morgan Stanley, wrote.

Recently, the company has been focused on improving its advertising prowess. Snap released a new ad platform that makes it easier to buy and track ads and has added new locations for these ads like its new "Snap Maps" feature.

While the company seems to be making the right moves, it isn't moving fast enough to meaningfully increase advertising revenue in the short term. According to Nowak, the sluggish performance means ad revenue will be lower by about 8.5% for the next two years, compared to previous estimates.

Engagement on the platform remains one of Snap's strengths. Even if advertising revenue comes up short in the near-term, Nowak is optimistic about the longer term opportunities. Engagement time per day by Snap's users is up 15% since the fourth quarter of 2016, equating to an average of more than 40 minutes per day for those under 40.

In terms of engagement, Snap recently overtook rivals Facebook and Instagram with teenagers. If the company is able to demonstrate that advertisers are willing to spend more than their current budgets on Snapchat ads, Nowak sees Snap's share price eventually growing to $25.

Since IPOing at $17 on March 1, Snap shares have fallen 14%. 

Snap is up 0.43% on Wednesday, and will have closed higher for six of the last seven trading days if it maintains its gains.

Click here to watch Snap's stock move in real time...

Snap stock price

SEE ALSO: WE WERE WRONG: Snap's lead IPO underwriter makes an embarrassing admission

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: THE BOTTOM LINE: New record highs for stocks and a deep dive into Apple's iPhone

MORGAN STANLEY: North Korea tensions could lead to 'aggressive protectionism' in the region

$
0
0

kim jong-un

LONDON – Rising tensions in North Korea could lead to protectionist measures across the far-east region, impacting the Chinese economy as well as North and South Korea, analysts at Morgan Stanley said on Wednesday.

Morgan Stanley's research team, headed by Deyi Tan, argues that while they do not necessarily expect the thread of "aggressive protectionism" to materialise, but that it could be highly damaging if it did.

"As policymakers strive to find a lasting solution to the uneasy equilibrium, a relevant and important risk to watch is how geopolitics may spill over to trade if the US undertakes protectionist measures to get China to exert influence on North Korea," the team wrote.

"Aggressive protectionism would not only have implications on China but also on the rest of the Asia region, given the regional production supply chain."

It echoes views from Capital Economics in a note discussing the likely economic impacts of nuclear war earlier in August.

"In particular, South Korea is the biggest producer of liquid crystal displays in the world (40% of the global total) and the second biggest of semiconductors (17% market share). It is also a key automotive manufacturer and home to the world's three biggest shipbuilders," Capital Economics' team of Gareth Leather and Krystal Tan wrote.

"If South Korean production was badly damaged by a war there would be shortages across the world. The disruption would last for some time — it takes around two years to build a semi-conductor factory from scratch."

Morgan Stanley makes clear that it does not see this as its base case, setting out three scenarios that it believes could play out.

In the first situation, the North Korean and American regimes maintain a "status quo of uneasy equilibrium," whereby the two nations "oscillate between temporary escalation & temporary de-escalation."

Morgan Stanley called its second scenario: "Peak escalation & disorderly resolution."

Here's how that looks (emphasis ours):

"In this scenario, North Korea does not de-nuclearise due to factors outlined above. The frequency of missile testing/launches by North Korea increases as part of its deterrent policy. Concurrently, military exercises by the US continue as part of its containment policy; the US also further increases its military presence in the region, while an engagement stance by S. Korea does not reap tangible results. Action/reaction from either side de-stabilise the uneasy equilibrium, resulting in peak escalation and a disorderly resolution."

Finally, the bank suggests that a de-escalation of tensions is likely, with North Korea conforming to international norms for the first time.

"North Korea agrees to a sustained effort to denuclearise, in exchange for significant economic concessions and, potentially, assurances of regime continuity," Morgan Stanley wrote.

"It eventually undertakes economic liberalisation/reforms. A nuclear deal, similar to that between Iran and various key stakeholders in 2015, is struck."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How working at Goldman Sachs is different from a hedge fund job


Fiat Chrysler found a magic formula with Ferrari — and it could use it on Maserati next (FCA, RACE)

$
0
0

Sergio Marchionne

Fiat Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne has been trying to merge with another automaker for years — and so far nothing's worked out. 

So now he's working to spin off FCA's brands that do well, a playbook he developed with Ferrari back in 2015. Now he's using that strategy again on Maserati.

On a conference call with analysts and reporters last month, the 65-year-old said “there are no structural, industrial, or engineering restrictions to the separation of Alfa and Maserati.”

Morgan Stanley agrees with him. In a note to clients out Wednesday, the bank says its something investors should pay close attention to. 

“We see potential for Maserati to be a stand-alone entity (entwined with Alfa Romeo) by the end of 2018,” write analysts at the bank. "We forecast Maserati sales to double by 2027 and value the business at nearly €7bn or €4.40 per FCA share.”

Morgan Stanley also raised it’s price target on Fiat Chrysler to €15, roughly 18% above where the stock was trading midday Thursday in New York.

The bank also sees the spinoff as a way for FCA to supplement the Alfa Romeo brand. Here’s how its analysts see the component parts individually:

FCA SOTP valuation

A Maserati-Alfa spinoff could be worth 3.1 billion euros, according to the bank's sum-of-the-parts analysis, and any income from the spinoff could help pay down FCA's 4.2 billion euros of debt. 

“We think it's reasonable to expect the Alfa Romeo business to be "conjoined" with the Maserati business for a number of reasons,” writes Morgan Stanley. “Primarily because Maserati's scale and engineering resources can help the struggling Alfa business to either pursue its own volume growth path or to help manage a winding down of the business.”

FCA cut its stake in Ferrari from 90% to 80% in an initial public offering in 2015, and then later distributed its remaining stake in Ferrari to FCA stockholders. Ferrari is currently the best-performing stock in the auto sector, up 93% year to date. That's better than even Tesla.

A Chinese buyer reportedly made an offer for another FCA subsidiary, Jeep, last week, but FCA rejected the deal.  

Screen Shot 2017 08 24 at 10.49.45 AM

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: THE BOTTOM LINE: New record highs for stocks and a deep dive into Apple's iPhone

MORGAN STANLEY: 'We expect UK house prices to fall as Brexit bites'

$
0
0

The Royal Crescent, Bath, England

LONDON — UK house prices and transaction volumes will fall as Brexit begins to bite, according to Morgan Stanley.

A note from researchers at the bank predicts a "modest housing market correction," with prices falling 1.6% year-on-year in 2018.

It forecasts a dip to -3% in Q4 2018 when GDP growth will likely be at its weakest as Brexit approaches.

Morgan Stanley also predicts transaction volumes will fall by 1% year-on-year in 2018.

'A modest house price correction'

Screen Shot 2017 08 24 at 15.24.40

The predictions are more bearish than other mainstream forecasts. Estate agents Savills predicted 2% growth in 2018, and property firm JLL predicted 1% growth in the same year.

The bank says price falls will be driven by three factors:

  • Weak income growth caused by above-target inflation;
  • Less favourable tax treatment for buyers;
  • Slowing population growth.

The note adds that the chronic lack of supply in the market "should work against any sustained downturn," however. It says the drivers of the slowdown will be partially offset by loose monetary policy.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Fidelity sector expert: Reports of a stock bubble are exaggerated

MORGAN STANLEY: Here are the insurers that stand to lose the most from Hurricane Harvey (ALL, TRV, HIG, PGR, BRKA)

$
0
0

hurricane harvey rescue

When the waters recede, damages from Hurricane Harvey, which struck the Texas coast this weekend, will be extensive.

They’ll also be extremely costly for insurers. Morgan Stanley is already beginning to think about total insurance claims.

“Early estimates on wind losses from RMS are in the low single digit $billions. Flooding has been extensive and could cause more insured losses than wind,” the bank said in a note published Monday morning.

Wind is typically covered under most personal and commercial insurance policies, but flooding is typically only covered under commercial policies, and not private homeowners’ policies.

For comparison, Hurricane Katrina in 2005 caused $79.7 billion in damages. In 2012, Hurricane Sandy caused $36.1 billion, and Hurricane Ike, which in 2008 hit a similar location along the Gulf coast as Harvey, caused $22.3 billion in damages.

Morgan Stanley pointed out that the ten largest homeowners' insurers are responsible for the bulk of that market. “The homeowners market is concentrated (the top-10 account for ~77% of the market), but wind losses could be less than flood losses. Top carriers in our coverage include ALL and TRV."

Here’s how the market share for homeowners’ insurance breaks down in Texas:

homeowners insurance market share texas

The stock prices of Allstate and Travellers were down 1.53% and 2.63%, respectively, Monday afternoon in New York. 

The commercial insurance market, on the other hand, is a little more fragmented than homeowners’, the bank says. “In the commercial market, the top-10 account for only about 55% of the market (with the largest two writers including HIG and TRV). Auto policies typically cover flood; largest writers in our coverage include ALL, BRK, and PGR,” according to Morgan Stanley.

Here’s the breakdown of commercial insurance market share in Texas:

commercial insurance market share texas harvey

Progressive's stock had shouldered the largest drop among this group so far, down 2.1% Monday afternoon in New York. Berkshire Hathaway A shares were down 0.77% and Hartford Financial Services was down 1.07%. 

Underwriters typically underperform the market after a natural disaster because of the tremendous upfront costs, Morgan Stanley notes, but they then tend to outpace market gains as the losses become more clearly defined.

"While it is too early to gauge ultimate losses, the industry's balance sheet is strong, with plenty of excess capital and an influx of alternative capital," writes Morgan Stanley. "We think Harvey could help stabilize global reinsurance pricing, but do not expect a major turn in pricing to follow."

SEE ALSO: 10 oil refineries in Texas have been shut down because of Hurricane Harvey

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: THE BOTTOM LINE: Gary Shilling on expensive stocks and Alibaba vs. Amazon

MORGAN STANLEY: Here are the insurers that stand to lose the most from Hurricane Harvey (ALL, TRV, HIG, PGR, BRKA)

$
0
0

hurricane harvey rescue

When the waters recede, damages from Hurricane Harvey, which struck the Texas coast this weekend, will be extensive.

They’ll also be extremely costly for insurers. Morgan Stanley is already beginning to think about total insurance claims.

“Early estimates on wind losses from RMS are in the low single digit $billions. Flooding has been extensive and could cause more insured losses than wind,” the bank said in a note published Monday morning.

Wind is typically covered under most personal and commercial insurance policies, but flooding is typically only covered under commercial policies, and not private homeowners’ policies.

For comparison, Hurricane Katrina in 2005 caused $79.7 billion in damages. In 2012, Hurricane Sandy caused $36.1 billion, and Hurricane Ike, which in 2008 hit a similar location along the Gulf coast as Harvey, caused $22.3 billion in damages.

Morgan Stanley pointed out that the ten largest homeowners' insurers are responsible for the bulk of that market. “The homeowners market is concentrated (the top-10 account for ~77% of the market), but wind losses could be less than flood losses. Top carriers in our coverage include ALL and TRV."

Here’s how the market share for homeowners’ insurance breaks down in Texas:

homeowners insurance market share texas

The stock prices of Allstate and Travellers were down 1.53% and 2.63%, respectively, Monday afternoon in New York. 

The commercial insurance market, on the other hand, is a little more fragmented than homeowners’, the bank says. “In the commercial market, the top-10 account for only about 55% of the market (with the largest two writers including HIG and TRV). Auto policies typically cover flood; largest writers in our coverage include ALL, BRK, and PGR,” according to Morgan Stanley.

Here’s the breakdown of commercial insurance market share in Texas:

commercial insurance market share texas harvey

Progressive's stock had shouldered the largest drop among this group so far, down 2.1% Monday afternoon in New York. Berkshire Hathaway A shares were down 0.77% and Hartford Financial Services was down 1.07%. 

Underwriters typically underperform the market after a natural disaster because of the tremendous upfront costs, Morgan Stanley notes, but they then tend to outpace market gains as the losses become more clearly defined.

"While it is too early to gauge ultimate losses, the industry's balance sheet is strong, with plenty of excess capital and an influx of alternative capital," writes Morgan Stanley. "We think Harvey could help stabilize global reinsurance pricing, but do not expect a major turn in pricing to follow."

SEE ALSO: 10 oil refineries in Texas have been shut down because of Hurricane Harvey

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The looming war between Alibaba and Amazon

TOP ANALYST: Wall Street is missing a critical part of the Apple story (AAPL)

$
0
0

iPhone chinaAll eyes are on Apple. 

The company will hold a product launch event on September 12, where it is expected to unveil three new iPhone models

Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty says this event should launch Apple into a so-called supercycle — with China fueling much of that growth. 

Business Insider spoke to Huberty about all things Apple, including her $183 price target for Apple's stock — 14% above the stock's current price and $10 higher than Wall Street consensus, according to Bloomberg.

She says Wall Street fundamentally misunderstands the Chinese market. Her models predict a 23% growth in iPhone sales over the next fiscal year — much higher than the 13% projected across the rest of Wall Street — thanks to strength in the Chinese market.

Here's what she had to say (emphasis added): 

On Chinese consumers:

"China is misunderstood by the market. If you look at Apple's results over the past year, China is a disappointing region. The investment community dialogue around that is that Apple may be losing its edge to local Chinese-branded smartphone makers like Vivo or Lenovo. We absolutely do not think that's the case.”

"Macs are growing double digits, iPads are growing double digits, services are growing double digits, but iPhone is not growing. It’s highly unlikely that Chinese consumers are paying $2000 for a Mac at home, but carrying a cheaper smartphone device with them. More likely, the explanation is that Apple's retail system is alive and well. High-end Chinese users want to buy Apple products, but the iPhone has not had a form factor change for three years. We believe that Chinese consumers are just waiting for that change.

"Year-old iPhones in China grew 56% this year and yet iPhone sales are declining, that gives you a sense of how much pent up demand there is on the back of this new iPhone that is launching in September.

On reading the wrong data:

"Wall Street looks at shipment data, and if you look at that data set, you'll see that local Chinese companies are taking share. We think that data is misleading. If a company ships products into a channel somewhere, even if that phone isn't purchased and activated, it still counts as a shipment. You've seen weakness at a number of semiconductor companies that sell into those cheaper brands, and their business has been very weak because there's inventory in the system.

"The quality of those devices are not as good as an iPhone, and therefore they don't last as long. They tend to get upgraded every 18 months whereas an iPhone tends to get upgraded every two to three years. What that means is you have to sell a lot more of them to have the same market share of the installed base. The shipment data is misleading. Wall Street looks at that and says that Apple is losing its edge, the reality is that there's a situation of pent up demand.

On Chinese competitors:

"In China and other emerging markets, there's more diversity because there's higher price sensitivity and larger low-end markets. It feels like every year or two there's a new winner in China, a company that grows really fast, that doubles shipments, that takes share, and then a year or two later they start to decline and another one emerges. We haven't seen yet in China any significant staying power for those local brands. Of those four - Vivo, Opo, Xiaomi, and Huawei - Huawei has had the most staying power, but recently hasn't had as much growth as Vivo or Lenovo.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The looming war between Alibaba and Amazon

A top Apple analyst has one big question for Tim Cook ahead of next month's event — and it has nothing to do with iPhones (AAPL)

$
0
0

Tim Cook

When Tim Cook takes the stage in California on September 12, tech gurus and journalists will be watching closely for the three new iPhone models that Apple is expected to announce. 

But Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty has her eyes on something less flashy than a next-generation OLED screen or prices of the new phones: She's focused on Apple Services.

It's not an exciting gadget, or even a groundbreaking technology, but Apple Services — which includes the App Store, Apple Pay, iTunes, and iCloud — made up 16% of Apple's total revenue last quarter, more than any segment except iPhone. 

Business Insider spoke to Huberty about all things Apple, from China to Wall Street, from new iPhones to self-driving cars, and her bullish $183 price target for the stock. Here's just a part of what she had to say ahead of Apple's much-anticipated event next month (her responses have been lightly edited for length and clarity.): 

Graham Rapier: What's the biggest question you have for management right now?

ARKitKaty Huberty: Apple in June launched ARKit, and will launch smartphones in September with improved camera capability that allows for advanced augmented reality experience. That ARKit allows all sorts of developers — from retailers, to gaming manufacturers, to social media companies — to take advantage of Apple's new hardware in this platform to write new applications.

To the extent that those are successful, not only will Apple take its 30% cut of those services, but the existing iPhone base will need to upgrade to new hardware that has this new camera capability. 

The biggest question is to get a better understanding of how Tim Cook sees ARKit and augmented reality as a category influencing the Apple model. Is that something that can really move the needle, accelerate upgrades, create new services, and new revenue streams in the next six to twelve months? Or is it a technology that they are planting a flag today that has longer term impact? If the company and the reality plays out that this is a trend over the next 12 months, that's something that's definitely not priced into shares.

On Apple TV:

Apple Carpool KaraokeHuberty: Apple hasn't announced it, but the press has reported Apple investing $1 billion in original video content.

TV and video is a big focus, and it's certainly of interest. Tim Cook has said they're interested in TV and original content, but going back to the Services discussion: Apple charges a tax on HBO, Showtime, and now even Amazon Prime is available on Apple TV.

They play Switzerland. They don't play favorites. They are taking a cut from everyone, and that creates a diversification. If Netflix were to stumble, there would be somebody else that picks up the slack and Apple will continue on collecting from all of those companies.

When you take a step back and think about strategy around video, how successful or disruptive do they really want to be, when you ultimately would be disrupting your partners? Particularly given that the 30% cut that Apple takes is pure profit.

So Apple would generate more revenue if they, for instance, owned one of those platforms, but the profit dollars probably aren't all that different. I'm always cautioning investors to think about the bigger picture strategy around services and whether Apple would ever push hard into a category like gaming or video where they're already collecting a large base of tax from third parties.

On self-driving cars:

apple car conceptHuberty: We think Apple might participate in electric or autonomous cars.

Our view is that Apple is most successful when they are vertically integrated, meaning they control the hardware, the software, the components and they control the platform for distributing third party services.

It's unlikely Apple is going to partner with somebody and allow them to design a big part of an automobile. If they decide to play, it is most likely to be Apple-designed, certainly partner built, but Apple-designed from hardware to software with a platform on top of it. We also believe that we are probably a decade away from an automobile having any impact on the financial model.

You can read the rest of Business Inisder's interview with Huberty here

Apple stock price chart

SEE ALSO: Read the rest of the interview with Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty here

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: GARY SHILLING: The Fed is wrong about wage inflation

There's a battle raging in the City about the pound's future

$
0
0

The Death of Major Pierson John Singleton Copley

  • Some analysts estimate that the pound and the euro will hit parity this year.
  • They cite the strengthening eurozone economy and Brexit uncertainties that they believe will drive the euro up and the pound down.
  • Parity has never happened in the 18 years in which the euro has existed.
  • Others believe that while the euro may strengthen a little more against the pound, parity is unlikely.

LONDON — There's a debate kicking off in the City of London over the pound's relationship with the euro.

In the year following Britain's vote to leave the European Union last June, analysis of sterling largely focused on its unprecedented drop against the dollar, which saw the currency plunge to a low not seen since the 1980s, and suffer the biggest single day fall of any major reserve currency in history.

But the pound's value against the euro has come sharply into focus more recently. The single currency has sharply appreciated against the dollar, from a low of $1.05 in April to $1.19 on Monday, as investors look to the improving economic fortunes of the eurozone as a reason to buy into the euro.

Around this time last year, calls were widespread that the euro would fall to parity with the dollar, but now, the more likely scenario is that the euro rises to parity with the pound.

There is a growing divide among forecasters about whether or not sterling will end up being worth less than the euro for the first time since the single currency came into existence in the late 1990s.

UBS Investment Bank was among the first to put its head above the parapet, telling Business Insider in January of this year that a realignment of the UK's bloated current account deficit, as well as Brexit-related economic weakness would drive down the pound to be worth €1.

"Our strategists are pricing in more weakness to come. Again, we've gone a long way, and yet the uncertainty that the Article 50 procedure is likely to bring further weakness," Chief European Economist Reinhard Cluse said.

Morgan Stanley's UK economics team has also recently argued for pound-euro parity in the near-term, even going so far as to forecast that the pound will end up being worth substantially less than the euro, as a combination of a stronger euro and a weakening pound forces the change.

On the one hand, Morgan Stanley argues, the euro's historic move beyond parity with the pound will be driven by continually increasing confidence in the eurozone economy, which will prompt major currency buyers to add a greater allocation of the euro to their portfolios.

"We expect EUR to stay strong as pension funds and insurance companies (such as those in Switzerland and Japan) start to increase their net EUR currency exposure from historically low levels," the team writes.

However, what will also drive the move is the weakness currently apparent in the British economy and the uncertainty surrounding Brexit negotiations, both of which will drive down the value of the pound.

"GBP is likely to weaken in its own right, driven by weak economic performance, low real yields and increasing political risks," the team wrote earlier in August.

Also throwing its weight behind a euro-pound parity call is Europe's biggest bank by assets, HSBC, which argues along similar lines as Morgan Stanley and UBS.

Several major firms may believe in euro-pound parity, but the view is far from the consensus in the market, with many more seeing the current downturn in the pound's fortunes against the euro coming to an end soon.

Writing last week economists Viraj Patel, Petr Krpata, and Chris Turner from Dutch lender ING argued that there are four prominent reasons to suggest that while the pound could go a little lower against the euro, it is unlikely to hit parity. ING's explanations are among the most cogent and thorough when it comes to pushing back on euro-pound parity calls, so Business Insider decided to look in depth.

First up, the trio suggest that the pound's recent weakness is starting to look "excessive relative to the near-term political risks at stake."

"This is certainly the case for EUR/GBP, which based on our estimates is trading around 4% above its short-term financial fair value," they add.

Here is the chart:

Screen Shot 2017 08 31 at 16.34.02

Secondly, ING's team believes that political will on both sides will ensure that a reasonable Brexit deal will be achieved.

"For GBP's politically-driven weakness to persist and extend all the way towards parity against the EUR, we would argue that 'hard Brexit' risks would need to notch up another gear," ING says.

"In reality, the only way this could occur over the next six months is if we get a nightmare Brexit scenario in October - that is a complete breakdown of UK-EU negotiations."

It should be noted that the note was sent before Brexit Secretary David Davis and chief EU negotiator Michel Barnier held a tense press conference in which Barnier claimed that British and EU negotiators have made no "decisive progress" on the key issues being discussed in the first stage of Brexit talks.

"We're quite far from being able to say sufficient progress has taken place," Barnier said on Thursday.

Third, Patel et al argue, the pound is "cheap, very cheap."

"We see GBP as extremely undervalued, with the very stretched valuation likely putting a limit on the scale of further downside. EUR/GBP is rich by a staggering 20% based on our medium-term Behavioural Equilibrium Exchange Rate (BEER) valuation framework," they write.

"Even if we control for the post 2015 rise in GBP fair value due to improving UK terms of trade and declining UK government consumption, EUR/GBP would still be overvalued by 14%."

Finally, the analysts argue, markets are now happy to wait and see when it comes to the Bank of England, having previously expected a hike in rates in the medium term.

"The latest round of key UK economic data has put talks of a BoE rate hike on the back burner, with the breakdown of 2Q GDP highlighting the current weakness of the UK consumer," they say.

Other financial forecasters and research house to argued against parity include Pantheon Macroeconomics — one of the only forecasters to correctly call this year's general election — and Oxford Economics, as well as numerous major banks.

With the euro-pound cross currently trading at 0.92, meaning that every euro is worth 92 pence, the single currency would need to appreciated roughly 8.5% more to hit parity, making it a tall order.

It may happen, but it will almost certainly not be a quick process.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: THE BOTTOM LINE: Warning shots for stocks and a look at bitcoin after the split


MORGAN STANLEY: Theresa May's government will collapse in 2018, triggering a fresh general election

$
0
0

Theresa May

  • May will be able to muddle through to the end of the year, but the pressure will be too great in 2018, Morgan Stanley says.
  • The cabinet will likely split over what sort of Brexit deal the UK wants, triggering a government collapse.
  • This, in turn, will weigh on the UK's already downtrodden economy and slow growth to a "standstill," according to the bank.

LONDON — Prime Minister Theresa May's Conservative government will collapse in 2018 and trigger a fresh general election, according to research from Morgan Stanley.

"We think the government survives in 2017, but falls in 2018," the note, compiled by a team of economists and strategists led by Jacob Nell and Melanie Baker.

After failing to win an overall majority in June's general election, May was forced to enter into a confidence and supply deal with the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) to ensure that she could govern.

May's slender parliamentary majority means only a handful of hardline Brexiteers would need to rebel against May on the issue to cause a disastrous government collapse.

Morgan Stanley's basic argument for suggesting that the government will collapse in 2018 is that May will be able to tread a tightrope of just about satisfying both the moderate and more radical wings of the Conservative Party — as well as the general public — until the end of 2017, but not for much longer.

"This year, we think that the government makes enough concessions to allow the talks to progress, and the government holds together since the outcome of the talks is still open and Labour are ahead in the polls," the team writes.

Brexit talks are currently stuttering, with Brexit Secretary David Davis and the EU's chief negotiator Michel Barnier holding a tense press conference last week at the conclusion of the latest round of negotiations. During that conference, Barnier said that British and EU negotiators made no "decisive progress" on the key issues being discussed, while Davis said virtually the opposite.

The two sides are yet to reach an agreement on the issues of citizens' rights, the Northern Irish border, and Britain's financial obligations, or the "Brexit bill" as it's more commonly known.

Next year, we think that the government is likely to fall

Talks on future UK-EU relations, including trade, were originally scheduled to commence next month. However, that now looks unlikely with the two sides struggling to find common ground on key issues.

While these issues can be navigated during 2017, by 2018, the pressure will sufficient to cause the government to split on key issues and consequently split. Here's Morgan Stanley again (emphasis ours):

"Next year, however, we think that the government is likely to fall. We expect the EU to offer a choice between a close relationship in which the UK can participate in the single market and customs union but will be bound by the EU rules of the game, and an arm's length relationship in the UK, in which the UK achieves full sovereignty over borders, courts and laws, but does not participate in the single market and the customs union.

"We think this choice splits the Cabinet and the Conservative party and will lead to a loss of a vote of no confidence in parliament, triggering early elections."

This political turmoil will then spill over into the economy, the note argues, saying that the government's collapse will "push growth to a standstill," something that could lead the Bank of England to cut interest rates or engage in a fresh programme of quantitative easing, although that is unlikely.

"In turn, we expect the associated political instability to drive weaker consumption and investment,and push growth to a standstill, leading the BoE to consider – but in the end decide against – easing policy to support growth," the team writes.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A $16 billion hedge fund CIO gives an easy explanation of quantitative trading

MORGAN STANLEY: There is a 10% chance that Brexit won't actually happen

$
0
0

Brexit

LONDON — There remains a small chance that Brexit will be reversed and Britain won't actually leave the European Union, according to research by analysts from Morgan Stanley.

The American bank's UK economics team published a huge strategy note discussing the huge variety of potential Brexit outcomes this week, as well as their economic and political consequences.

Within the note, the team —led by Jacob Nell and Melanie Baker — argued that there is a much as a 10% chance that Brexit may not end up happening, despite the fact Britain and the EU are already six months into negotiations.

Describing any chance of a Brexit reversal as "modest," Morgan Stanley lays out the scenario it envisions could lead to Britain staying in the 28-nation bloc.

"A Brexit reversal scenario would require three changes, in our view, the combination of which has a low probability," the team writes. 

Those three scenarios are as follows:

  1. "Another election before the UK leaves the single market, which we see as a two-thirds probability." Morgan Stanley's team said, in the same note that it expects Theresa May's government to collapse in 2018 as splits in the cabinet over Brexit become untenable. 
  2. Secondly, Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Party would need to win that election, either with a majority in the House of Commons, or through some sort of minority/coalition government. 
  3. Third, Morgan Stanley says, Labour would need to change one of its key Brexit policies. "A change in Labour policy to supporting free movement of labour, perhaps in a modified form, which we see as no more than a one-third probability."

Screen Shot 2017 09 04 at 14.04.31

To be clear, the 10% probability of a Brexit pull-back means it is still very, very likely that Britain leaves the EU in some form — whether that is as a member of the EEA, outside the single market, or in any one of myriad possibilities. 

"If you take these probabilities seriously – and they are only meant to be indicative – this would imply that the probability of an eventual Brexit reversal continues to be modest, in the 10% range," the note says.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The stock market is on bubble watch — And unlike the dotcom era, this time the whole market is expensive

Tesla is revealing a semitrailer this month that it won't deliver for years — here's why (TSLA)

$
0
0

Tesla semitruck

Tesla is expected to reveal a design for a semitrailer this month. CEO Elon Musk has been heralding this move into the freight business since last year, when he rolled out his "Master Plan, Part Deux."

According to Morgan Stanley analyst Ravi Shanker, the vehicle will be what's known as a Class 8 truck — a great big old over-the-road semi designed to haul large amounts of stuff. Despite that, Shanker doesn't think the Tesla semi will have a long-range battery delivering 600 or more miles of range; something like 300 miles is more realistic, because of battery costs, and Tesla will deal with the range issue by swapping batteries or enhancing its charging capabilities.

In a note published Wednesday, Shanker suggested that Tesla wouldn't start selling the semi until 2020, but that won't prevent the company from lining up customers.

"We expect Tesla to start taking orders for the truck from the day of the event (we estimate a refundable $5,000 deposit)," he wrote. "We believe this could set off competition for intelligent trucks in the industry."

Shanker calculates that the truck business could add up to almost $12 billion in business by 2028.

This all sounds pretty good, but remember that Tesla has taken something on the order of 500,000 deposits for its Model 3 sedan, at $1,000 a pop. As of August, just more than 100 vehicles had been delivered as Tesla ramped up production. But even with an aggressive ramp, it will take Tesla years to fulfill those preorders.

Tesla Model 3 Reveal

Shanker expects Tesla semi deposits to be refundable, and by now everyone knows that putting down some money to get a place in line to buy a Tesla can mean a bit of a wait. But in the short term, if Tesla debuts the semi alongside some industry partnerships and can encourage a healthy pace of preorders, it will have another funding stream at a time when its cash needs are rapidly intensifying.

Obviously, getting in early on a Tesla semi doesn't come without risks. Job one at Tesla right now is getting hundreds of thousands of Model 3s into customers' hands. It also has to figure out a way to get its solar-roof business cranking and grow its battery-storage business while ensuring that its Gigafactory in Nevada can supply enough lithium-ion battery cells to satisfy the company's diverse needs.

It's easy to see the semi as a very big distraction, though Musk himself seems quite excited by the project. (And who wouldn't be? Big trucks are cool.) There's no arguing with the deposit funding, however. For Tesla right now, every dollar helps.

SEE ALSO: BMW will reveal an ultra-high-performance MINI concept this month — and it looks awesome

 FOLLOW US on Facebook for more car and transportation content!

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Elon Musk reveal Tesla's long-awaited Model 3

MORGAN STANLEY ON FERRARI: 'It's time for a pit stop' (RACE)

$
0
0

car pit stop

Ferrari may be one of the S&P 500’s best performing stocks this year — up 84% since January 1 — but “things have changed,” according to Morgan Stanley.

It downgraded the luxury automaker Thursday, warning that the sharp share price appreciation over the last 24 months has led to the stock being overvalued. It also said Ferrari faces looming threats from competitors like McLaren, Aston Martin, and Lamborghini.

“We believe the stock may have achieved 2 or 3 years' worth of share price appreciation in just the past few months,” writes analyst Adam Jonas. “For most of the stock's brief history since the IPO, we have been intrigued by how little attention US investors paid to the name. This has changed materially in 2017.”

Shares of Ferrari fell about 7% once markets opened Thursday morning.

Rumors swirled early last month about a potential Ferrari SUV. On an earnings call, CEO Sergio Marchionne said “it will probably happen, but Ferrari style.” When asked if it might resemble Porsche’s Cayenne, Marchionne said “Hell no … that would be obscene.”

Even if Ferrari were to put out an SUV sometime soon, Morgan Stanley says it would “move Ferrari in the direction of transportation, rather than uncompromising human driving pleasure.” Merely providing transportation is something the luxury Italian automaker has historically avoided. 

Until something is concrete, Morgan Stanley is sticking with its $100 price target — 7.7% lower than where shares were trading Thursday afternoon.

“Ferrari is a strong and unique company that, in our opinion, is no longer attractively valued,” writes the bank. “Time for a pit stop.”

Ferrari stock price

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Trump's lack of progress has caused a major dollar reversal

Morgan Stanley thinks Goodyear is a good bet if you're worried about electric cars taking over the world (GT)

$
0
0

Goodyear Tires

Investors are concerned that electric cars are poised to dominate the transportation future, so they've rewarded Tesla with a massive market capitalization and punished the stock of traditional automakers, such as Ford and General Motors.

Even though old-line car companies, along with suppliers and dealers, have enjoyed record annual sales of 17.5 million and 17.55 million new vehicles in 2015 and 2016, optimism about the industry is in short supply.

Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas thinks there might be a name that investors don't properly appreciate, however: Goodyear Tire & Rubber. His price target for shares of the nearly 120-year-old company is $46, and he rates the stock "overweight," with a bull case for $80 (the stock is flat year-to-date and was trading at $31 on Monday).

In a research note on all things tires, Jonas stressed that Goodyear could finish out 2017 strong.

"The stock is one of the cheapest stocks in the S&P 500, the US Autos & Shared Mobility coverage universe, and global tire stocks," he wrote.

"GT is relatively less exposed to the light vehicle credit cycle, used car prices, and [internal combustion engine] power train decline, the three key factors that drive our cautious view on many names in the sector." he added.

The bottom line is that cars aren't going away, and both electric and autonomous vehicles will require something round to roll around on. In fact, Morgan Stanley expects the total number of miles traveled to "double to 20 trillion" by 2030, and "triple to 30 trillion" by 2040. That's going to mean a whole lot of worn-out tired over the next 20 years.

GT Chart

SEE ALSO: The Acura TLX A-Spec is one of the most impressive cars we've driven all year

 FOLLOW US on Facebook for more car and transportation content!

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Elon Musk reveal Tesla's long-awaited Model 3

Viewing all 1395 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>